The Conspiracy to Keep You Poor and Stupid is a trademark of Donald L. Luskin

Latest
Media Infiltrations:

Republicans and the Populist Temptation
Wall Street Journal
February 9, 2010
Why Taxing Stock Trades Is a Really Bad Idea
Wall Street Journal
January 6, 2010

Krugman Truth Squad logo, courtesy Tom Miller, Atomic Art: admin@atomicart.com

Peter Sellers and Peter Bull in ''Dr. Strangelove'' Columbia Pictures, 1964 -- Click to order!

"What has been your worst blogging experience?
Donald Luskin."
-- Brad DeLong

"That's a guy who actually stalks me on the Web and once stalked me personally."
-- Paul Krugman

"I'm saying this...guy's a jerk."
-- Charlie Gasparino

What I'm reading:
cover
The Happy Body
Aniela and Jerzy Gregorek

What I'm listening to:
cover
Langley Schools Music Project

What I'm watching:
cover
Star Trek

What I'm playing:
cover
Speed Racer

Order these from Amazon.com
at Amazon's normal low prices...
and a fraction of your order goes
to help support this site.
Thanks!

Thanks to Irwin Chusid, public editor.

Copyright 2002 thru 2009
Donald L. Luskin
don-at-luskin-dot-net
All rights reserved.
"The Conspiracy to
Keep You Poor and Stupid"
and "Krugman Truth Squad"
are trademarks of
Donald L. Luskin
www.poorandstupid.com

Logo by Tommy Carnase 1995

"The road is cleared," said Galt.
"We are going back to the world."
He raised his hand
and over the desolate earth
he traced in space
the sign of the dollar.

From Atlas Shrugged
by Ayn Rand

From each as they choose,
to each as they are chosen.

From Anarchy, State and Utopia
by Robert Nozick

"there is some shit I will not eat"

From i sing of olaf glad and big
by e. e. cummings


In Association with Amazon.com

Powered by Blogger Pro™

Chronicle of the Conspiracy
Join us as we discover, document, expose and challenge the bad people, the bad institutions and the bad ideas that stand in the way of wealth creation -- and show you how to fight back!

Thursday, January 28, 2010

THE MORE STIMULUS FAILS, THE MORE STIMULUS COSTS   Yep. That's the way incentives work in Washington. From our more conservative friends on the House Ways and Means Committee:
Democrats promised their 2009 stimulus law would get people back to work and jumpstart the economy. A look at the facts, however, tells a different story. As we approach the one-year anniversary of passage of the stimulus bill 49 out of 50 states have actually LOST jobs.

On January 26, 2010, the Congressional Budget Office revealed that this failure to create jobs has raised the law’s price tag from the original $787 billion to $862 billion – an increase of $75 billion.

The reason? Higher than expected unemployment and greater payouts of unemployment benefits, among other causes.

January 26, 2010 Congressional Budget Office Analysis:

* “When ARRA was being considered, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimated that it would increase budget deficits by a total of $787 billion between fiscal years 2009 and 2019.” (page 95)

* “CBO’s current projection of ARRA’s budgetary impact over the 2009–2019 period—a total increase in deficits of $862 billion—is about $75 billion greater than the agency originally estimated.” (page 98)

* "Although total spending from ARRA in 2009 was roughly in line with CBO’s estimate, the cost of some individual components varied from the amounts initially anticipated. Most significantly, outlays for additional unemployment compensation were about $10 billion higher than CBO originally estimated, because the unemployment rate was higher than anticipated and people continued to collect benefits for a longer period of time.” (page 97)


Posted by Donald L. Luskin at 10:40 AM | link  

LYING LITTLE DIRTBAG   Sorry. That's very harsh. Let me rephrase that. "Lying dirtbag." There. That's better.

From Big Journalism:

Former Obama economic advisor, Clinton Secretary of Labor, and Berkely Prof. Robert Reich claimed yesterday in his column at Salon.com that Fox News played a role in the conservative resurgence of 1994:
In December 1994, Bill Clinton proposed a so-called middle-class bill of rights including more tax credits for families with children, expanded retirement accounts, and tax-deductible college tuition. Clinton had lost his battle for healthcare reform. Even worse, by that time the Dems had lost the House and Senate. Washington was riding a huge anti-incumbent wave. Right-wing populists were the ascendancy, with Newt Gingrich and Fox News leading the charge. Bill Clinton thought it desperately important to assure Americans he was on their side.
But Prof. Reich overlooked one minor detail: Fox News Channel’s first broadcast wasn’t until October 7, 1996.

The plan for FNC wasn’t even outlined until January of 1996, so what could explain such a patently false claim? Is the professor suggesting that even in 1994, Fox News’ imminence did in fact play a role in the political upheaval of that year?

Or is this a moment where Fox Derangement Syndrome enters the realm of full-blown paranoia?

Either way, where was Salon on this one to save Reich from himself? And would Prof. Reich tolerate fact-checking this poor from his college students?

Thanks to Jameson Campaigne.

Update... More from Big Journo:

Salon corrected the mistake. Reich’s article was cross-posted at Huffington Post (yet to be corrected) and at RobertReich.org, where the professor took out the error and replaced it with a dig at Fox News.

Posted by Donald L. Luskin at 1:45 AM | link  


Tuesday, January 26, 2010

MICK CROWS   An update from "Mick Danger":
Of course, readers of your blog would have known much of this already via Mick’s post on David Brooks's ramblings on the “educated class,” and his crystal ball readings the day before the Massachusetts Senate election.

Michael Barone writes up the same stuff beautifully a week later, and proves it carefully with data.

Bottom line: The Democratic candidate held “the educated class” corridor, but failed to generate good turnout or high percentages in the factory and mill towns. The other corridors swung heavily to the Republican candidate. Under Barack Obama, who has chosen to live all his adult life in university neighborhoods, the Democratic Party has been reduced, at least in Massachusetts and in this special election, to “the educated class”—and not much else.

Posted by Donald L. Luskin at 7:58 PM | link  

KUDLOW REPLAY   Here's the YouTube video of a few words in edgewise -- always hard to stop a lynch mob.


Posted by Donald L. Luskin at 9:54 AM | link  

BLOGS WITH A UNION LABEL   From my DC-insider friend "Mick Danger":
From the heady, Obama-crazy days of last year:
Green jobs [yes, this labor blog used the color red for "green jobs"] can be a pathway to middle class for millions of Americans, but only if we ensure they come with good wages and benefits, union and environmental leaders told a White House panel. Speaking to the first meeting of Vice President Biden’s Middle Class Task Force in Philadelphia today, United Steelworkers (USW) President Leo Gerard said any new green jobs also must be good jobs.
The head of the steelworkers union — guys who use fire and carbon to make steel — wants more “green jobs”? All makes sense when you translate that phrase “any new green jobs also must be good jobs” as “jobs obliged by law to pay a monthly vig to Leo.”

Looks like Leo is banking on these new green union dues to eventually replace those from his steelworkers. Wonder if he brings that little scheme up with the hardhats?

That was last year. What’s new?

No green jobs, good or not, as oil and natural gas prices aren’t sky high, Cap and Trade flopped, Waxman & Markey couldn’t buy a vowel in the Senate, and the only jobs created by the DOE green energy spending spree are...new DOE employees, an agency with a different union.

So...what says that same Labor Blog today? Blah, Blah, Blah.

As Mark Steyn would say, where did all the “hopey-changey “ go?


Posted by Donald L. Luskin at 9:50 AM | link  


Monday, January 25, 2010

BETTING ON BERNANKE   I'm quoted on the CBS MoneyWatch blog:
At around 4 p.m. Monday, the price of a $10 contract [on Intrade] in favor of the Chairman [Bernanke being confirmed as Fed chair] traded at 93. Taking such a bet you would buy in at $9.30, and in the event of BBII, you'd collect $10 from InTrade, less commissions.

I've never looked at InTrade before, but among the many political outcomes you could wager on, this one seems to be the most one-sided. That is, the weight of money is on Ben.

One who seems to be is Donald Luskin, an accomplished investor and trader, and today chief investment officer of Trend Macrolytics, a research firm for institutional investors. On the InTrade web site, Mr. Luskin gets credit for thinking up the Bernanke contract, back in August when President Obama first made his renomination.

In a phone call Monday, Mr. Luskin told me:

These so-called ‘prediction markets' are really accurate. They get a first call on things that other means of prediction, such as opinion surveys, don't get. They were all over Scott Brown [last week's Massachusetts upset winner in the U.S. Senate], and a while ago they were even right on the new pope.

These are great little laboratories that show how markets work. The person that knows the most will make the largest bet, and influence the market the most. In a simple opinion poll, any idiot can shoot his mouth off about he wants, rather than what he really predicts,and doesn't have to be right or wrong.

So I take it on face value that there's a 93 percent chance that Bernanke will be renominated.


Posted by Donald L. Luskin at 5:38 PM | link