The Conspiracy to Keep You Poor and Stupid is a trademark of Donald L. Luskin

Latest
Media Infiltrations:

Deadly Rescue
National Review
November 17, 2008
Krugman’s Posthumous Nobel
National Review Online
October 14, 2008

Krugman Truth Squad logo, courtesy Tom Miller, Atomic Art: admin@atomicart.com

Peter Sellers and Peter Bull in ''Dr. Strangelove'' Columbia Pictures, 1964 -- Click to order!

"What has been your worst blogging experience?
Donald Luskin."
-- Brad DeLong

"That's a guy who actually stalks me on the Web and once stalked me personally."
-- Paul Krugman

"I'm saying this...guy's a jerk."
-- Charlie Gasparino

What I'm reading:
cover
A Bound Man
Shelby Steele

What I'm listening to:
cover
Langley Schools Music Project

What I'm watching:
cover
There Will Be Blood

What I'm playing:
cover
Speed Racer

Order these from Amazon.com
at Amazon's normal low prices...
and a fraction of your order goes
to help support this site.
Thanks!

Amazon Honor SystemClick Here to PayLearn More

Thanks to Irwin Chusid, public editor.

Copyright 2002 thru 2008
Donald L. Luskin
All rights reserved.
"The Conspiracy to
Keep You Poor and Stupid"
and "Krugman Truth Squad"
are trademarks of
Donald L. Luskin
www.poorandstupid.com

Logo by Tommy Carnase 1995

"The road is cleared," said Galt.
"We are going back to the world."
He raised his hand
and over the desolate earth
he traced in space
the sign of the dollar.

From Atlas Shrugged
by Ayn Rand

From each as they choose,
to each as they are chosen.

From Anarchy, State and Utopia
by Robert Nozick

"there is some shit I will not eat"

From i sing of olaf glad and big
by e. e. cummings

Some of the sites
that have linked to us!
* recently updated


In Association with Amazon.com

Powered by Blogger Pro™

Powered by Blogger Pro™

The Conspiracy Letters
Join the fray! Email us at letters@poorandstupid.com. We reserve the right to publish all letters with authors' names, unless specified as not for publication or for publication anonymously. Letters may be edited for clarity and brevity.

Friday, July 28, 2006

DESIRE AND PERSISTENCE   I have some expertise in this area, I think ["Have You Considered Redistributing Your Desire?" 7/25/2006]. I teach in a Masters of Public Administration Program. We have some 125 students in the program, of whom about 100 are taking classes during any given semester. Probably 60% are "in service" (i.e. already working in a public admin or civil service position or for a non-profit), 30% are working full-time outside of govt or NPOs and 10% are full-time students.

I have had students who I later found had worse personal situations than the one described. It didn't always stop them. Mostly it appears to me to be a question of desire and persistence. The op ed writer doesn't obviously display much of either.

Sure, it's tough, but my good students work really hard, produce great work, and finish the course. Full-time students frequently finish in 2 years while the others take up to 4.

It is a balancing act, but it is being done routinely by my students.
OTOH, I do have a (thankfully small) number of student whiners. It's not just free grad school they seek, it's free everything, including grades and a degree. My guess is the op ed person would fit in the latter. It would be interesting to talk confidentially to her profs and find out.

James Ivers

Posted by Donald L. Luskin at 4:10 PM | link   

WHO'S "UPPER CLASS" NOW?   I sometimes wonder how opinion pieces like these ["Have You Considered Redistributing Your Desire?" 7/25/2006] can actually be printed in major newspapers. The author is complaining about graduate school only being available for the "upper class" in society and how she is not part of that "upper class". What amazes me is how her own situation contradicts her point? "Is access to graduate education in America exclusively for the upper class? As a first-year graduate student struggling to make ends meet, I believe the answer is yes." - If graduate education in America (I guess, as opposed to every where else in the world) is exclusively for the upper class, then how is the author a graduate student? Is she a part of the "upper class" or has she lied to infiltrate this elite society of wealth in order to get an education? All she says throughout the article is that she is struggling...so, she is complaining that paying for graduate school is not easy. She states "It's clear that a federal need-based grant program for graduate students must be created. This would help level the playing field by creating access to graduate programs for students -- access based on merit and ambition rather than economic resources." This translates into "I am attending and paying for graduate school but finding it difficult. Would the government please force someone to pay for my education since I do not want to go through these hard times?" It is not a "need-based" program she wants, but a "wants-based" program.

And, as a man who grew up in a small town in Oklahoma (~800 people), who lived in a trailer all his childhood, whose father passed away when he was 17, and whose mother works as a janitor, I graduated with a Master's degree from Princeton University without any government aid - yes, an Ivy League school. I guess the author will have to categorize me and my family as "upper class" now.

Shawn Smith

Posted by Donald L. Luskin at 12:23 AM | link   


There's more...visit the archives!